From Isolation to Integration: Post-Pandemic Paradigms in Public Building Design

Main Article Content

Yixing Yu

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly reshaped public building design, prompting a shift from isolation-oriented strategies focused on containment and physical distancing toward integration-oriented paradigms that prioritize adaptability, health, and social connectivity. This paper theorizes the post-pandemic evolution of architectural design, emphasizing the convergence of resilience, human-centered approaches, and technological innovation. It examines spatial and functional transformations, including adaptive layouts, ventilation optimization, biophilic elements, and smart, contactless systems, highlighting their roles in balancing safety and sociability. Furthermore, the study explores socio-environmental integration, addressing psychological recovery, community inclusivity, and the alignment of sustainable technologies with occupant well-being. Key challenges, such as cost, regulatory constraints, technological inequality, and privacy concerns, are analyzed, alongside future research directions involving digital twins, AI modeling, and behavioral data integration. The findings underscore the importance of an interdisciplinary framework that unites public health, environmental sustainability, and architectural design, advancing a vision of human-centered resilience as the guiding principle for post-pandemic public architecture. This paradigm offers a comprehensive approach for designing spaces that are simultaneously safe, adaptable, inclusive, and psychologically restorative.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

From Isolation to Integration: Post-Pandemic Paradigms in Public Building Design. (2025). Hua Xia Xin Zhi, 1(1), 1-7. https://journals.hubblepress.com/index.php/hxxz/article/view/1

References

1. Y. Liu, “Post-pandemic architectural design: A review of global adaptations in public buildings,” International Journal of Engineering Advances, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 91–100, 2025, doi: 10.71222/1cj1j328.

2. Y. Kong, C. Teng, and C. Liu, "Transition design as a strategy for post-pandemic spatial experience enhancement: A sustaina-bility perspective," Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 14, p. 5834, 2024.

3. C. Zimring et al., "Influences of building design and site design on physical activity: research and intervention opportunities," American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 186–193, 2005.

4. C. Sun, Q. Liu, and Y. Han, "Many-objective optimization design of a public building for energy, daylighting and cost per-formance improvement," Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 2435, 2020.

5. B. I. Ouedraogo, G. J. Levermore, and J. B. Parkinson, "Future energy demand for public buildings in the context of climate change for Burkina Faso," Building and Environment, vol. 49, pp. 270–282, 2012.

6. A. H. Nawawi and N. Khalil, "Post-occupancy evaluation correlated with building occupants' satisfaction: An approach to performance evaluation of government and public buildings," Journal of Building Appraisal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 59–69, 2008.