Digital Platform Development Across Diverse Industry Applications

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2025-10-28
Keywords:
digital platforms, software development efficiency, construction technology, platform ecosystems, industry transformation, innovation strategies

Main Article Content

Carlos Ramirez
Department of Computer Engineering, New Mexico Highlands University, Las Vegas, NM 87701, USA
Jing Liu
School of Software Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China

Abstract

Digital platforms have emerged as transformative frameworks that facilitate interactions, transactions, and value creation across multiple industries. This paper examines the development and implementation of digital platforms in software development, construction, and architectural design sectors. The research explores how continuous integration practices enhance software delivery efficiency, how construction project management benefits from digital technologies, and how architectural design adapts to post-pandemic requirements. Through comprehensive analysis of platform architectures, governance structures, and ecosystem dynamics, this study demonstrates the universal applicability of platform-based approaches while acknowledging sector-specific implementation challenges. The findings reveal that successful platform development requires balancing control mechanisms with external contributions, establishing appropriate boundary resources, and fostering complementary innovation. This research contributes to understanding how digital platforms serve as catalysts for industry transformation, enabling enhanced efficiency, improved collaboration, and sustainable practices across diverse professional domains.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Digital Platform Development Across Diverse Industry Applications. (2025). Hua Xia Xin Zhi, 1(1), 32-42. https://journals.hubblepress.com/index.php/hxxz/article/view/4

References

1. S. Yang, “The Impact of Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery on Software Development Efficiency,” Journal of Computer, Signal, and System Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 59–68, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.71222/pzvfqm21.

2. A. Gawer, “Bridging Differing Perspectives on Technological platforms: toward an Integrative Framework,” Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1239–1249, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006.

3. Y. Liu, “Post-pandemic Architectural Design: A Review of Global Adaptations in Public Buildings,” International Journal of Engineering Advances, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 91–100, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.71222/1cj1j328.

4. A. Tiwana, B. Konsynski, and A. A. Bush, “Research Commentary—Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics,” Information Systems Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 675–687, 2010, doi: 10.1287/isre.1100.0323.

5. S. Jing, "Practice of digital construction to improve construction project progress management," Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 36–44, 2025, doi: 10.25236/AJETS.2025.080205.

6. G. Wang, "Performance evaluation and optimization of photovoltaic systems in urban environments," Int. J. New Dev. Eng. Soc., vol. 9, pp. 42–49, 2025, doi: 10.25236/IJNDES.2025.090106.

7. Y. Li, X. Zhao, C. Liu, and Z. Zhang, “Applications of Digital Technologies in Promoting Sustainable Construction Practices: A Literature Review,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 487, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17020487.

8. W. Xin, J. Lin, X. Zhou, and S. Yin, “Envelopment strategies and contract design of two-sided platforms,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 269, p. 109158, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109158.

9. M. Grossmann, M. Lang, and H. M. Dietl, “A Dynamic Contest Model of Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2091–2109, 2021, doi: 10.3390/jtaer16060117.

10. F. Angelini, M. Castellani, and L. Zirulia, “Platform investment and seller competition in two-sided markets,” Journal of Economics, vol. 144, no. 1, pp.1-29, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00712-024-00874-x.

11. J. Cenamor and J. Frishammar, “Openness in platform ecosystems: Innovation strategies for complementary products,” Research Policy, vol. 50, no. 1, p. 104148, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104148.

12. M. de Reuver, C. Sørensen, and R. C. Basole, “The Digital Platform: A Research Agenda,” Journal of Information Technology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 124–135, 2018, doi: 10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3.

13. A. Hein, C. Schreieck, M. Riasanow, D. S. Setzke, M. Wiesche, M. Böhm, and H. Krcmar, “Digital platform ecosystems,” Electronic Markets, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 87–98, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4.

14. A. Ghazawneh and O. Henfridsson, “Balancing Platform Control and External Contribution in third-party development: the Boundary Resources Model,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 173–192, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x.